Analyze the supersonic flow expansion over a 15º corner at a Mach number M=2.5. The fluid is assumed to be an ideal gas with γ=1.4, and the flow should be assumed inviscid. This type of flow is well known as the Prandtl-Meyer expansion and it has analytic solutions. The physical parameters and the computational grid for this test correspond to a NPARC Alliance Validation Archive test [1].
Since the flow is assumed inviscid, the Euler set of equations is solved.
The computational grid is downloaded from the referenced website [1]. The format of the file is cgd (common grid file). This file is imported into ADF viewer. Using this software the x coordinates and the y coordinates are extracted into separate files, x.dat and y.dat, respectively. Following this step a small utility, CGDTOP3D.F90, is used to convert the two files into a single file, PM_exp.grd, containing the computational grid in PLOT3D format. The computational grid is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1 Computational grid used for the simulation of supersonic expansion over a 15o corner at M=2.5. The area around the corner marked with a rectangle in Fig. 1(a) is enlarged in Fig. 1(b). The small circle in Fig. 1(a) marks the location (x,y)=(1.92,-0.12) where the flow properties will be compared with analytical predictions.
The temperature, pressure, and Mach number fields obtained from the numerical simulations are shown in Figs. 2 through 4, respectively. The results obtained with the MUSCL and the WENO schemes are qualitatively similar. Various flow properties sampled at (x,y) = (1.92, -0.12),which is a location where the supersonic expansion is completed, and are compared with analytical solutions in Table 1.
Fig. 2 Temperature fields corresponding to simulations using (a) MUSCL and (b) WENO spatial difference schemes. The small circles mark the location where the flow properties will be compared with analytical predictions.
Fig. 3 Pressure fields corresponding to simulations using (a) MUSCL and (b) WENO spatial difference schemes.
Fig. 4 Mach number fields corresponding to simulations using (a) MUSCL and (b) WENO spatial difference schemes.
Table 1. Comparison of flow properties at (x,y)=(1.92,-0.12) obtained with AEROFLO using MUSCL and WENO schemes with analytical solutions and previous results reported in Reference [1].
[1] http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/wind/valid/pm15/pm15.html (cited on July 2, 2006)
© 2025 All Rights Reserved.