Home > Sample Problems > Hypersonic Flow Past a Cylinder
Hypersonic Flow Past a
Cylinder
Problem Description
Radius |
1.5 in |
Figure 1. Hypersonic blunt body
problem |
M¥ |
16.34 | |
Re |
1.2 x 106 per foot | |
P¥ |
0.01203 psi | |
T¥ |
93.93 R | |
Twall |
530 R | |
Surface
Recell |
3.7 | |
Prandtl
No |
0.72 | |
Sutherland
parameter |
2.1195 | |
|
|
This test case represents a low-enthalpy flow for which the assumption of a perfect gas has been shown to be valid. Experimental data for surface pressure and heat transfer rates exists. Numerical work comparing approximate Riemann solvers with flux-split methods has matched the experimental results. Numerical results are often characterized by carbuncle phenomena, which can be suppressed through tuning of an entropy correction factor for some schemes.
Mesh
The computational mesh contains two 2D blocks. Both of the block sizes are 79 ´ 71. The mesh geometry is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. Computational Mesh
Simulation Parameters
Overall
Flow Conditions | |||
Mach No. |
16.34 | ||
Viscosity |
Laminar | ||
Spatial
Scheme | |||
MUSCL |
WENO 33 |
WENO 34 | |
Time
Scheme | |||
BW2 |
|
| |
Boundary
Conditions | |||
Block 1 |
I=1 |
Coupling to Block 2 | |
I=79 |
Neumann for 老, u, v, w, p | ||
J=1 |
老=1; u=1; v=0; w=0; p=0.002675 | ||
J=71 |
Solid wall; 老=66.25p | ||
Block 2 |
I=1 |
Coupling to Block 1 | |
I=79 |
Neumann for 老, u, v, w, p | ||
J=1 |
Solid wall; 老=66.25p | ||
J=71 |
老=1; u=1; v=0; w=0; p=0.002675 | ||
Initial Conditions | |||
老=1; u=1; v=0; w=0; p=0.002675 | |||
Table
1. Simulation Parameters
Obtain the
Files
Both mesh files and project input files can be accessed below. Remember to place the grid files in a subfolder with the set up file /Hyper.
Setup file (hyperbb.afl)
Grid files (2d_bg_dp_form.grd and 2d_tg_dp_form.grd).
Start the
Simulation
Change the directory to the subfolder with the selected grid and spatial scheme. Start the simulation by
mpirun 每np 2 mpiaeroflo.exe <
hyperbb.afl
The calculation starts from a small time step size 忖t = 1.0´10-6 for 10,000 steps. Then calculate the simulation with a larger time step size 忖t = 5.0´10-6 for 50,000 steps. Finally the simulation is calculated with a time step size 忖t = 1.0´10-5 for 1,000,000 steps.
Simulation
Results
Figures 3, 4 and 5 are the nondimensionalized pressure contours for the MUSCL, WENO 33 and WENO 34 calculations, respectively.
Figure
3. Nondimensionalized Pressure Contour (MUSCL)
Figure
4. Nondimensionalized Pressure Contour (WENO 33)
Figure 5. Nondimensionalized Pressure Contour (WENO 34)
Comparison of
Different Spatial Schemes
Figure 6 shows the surface pressure distribution for different spatial schemes. The results are also compared with experimental results. Note that both of the WENO 33 and WENO 34 schemes blow out during the calculation.
Convergence
Performance
Figure 7 compares the convergence performance of the three spatial schemes.
Figure 6. Surface Pressure with Comparisons of Experimental Data
Figure 7. Convergence of Three
Spatial Schemes
Reference:
1. R.K. Prabhu, J.R. Stewart, and R.R. Thareja. A Navier-Stokes Solver for High Speed Equilibrium Flows and Applications to Blunt Bodies. AIAA Paper 89-0688, 1989
2. M.S. Holden, A.R. Wieting, J.R.
3. D. Gaitonde, and J.S. Shang. The Performance of Flux-Split Algorithms in High-Speed Viscous Flows. AIAA Paper 92-0186, 1992
4. S. Sherer 每 private communication